I can
tell stories of my various life experiences, yes, but to speak of or otherwise
discuss these in a philosophical or spiritual or psychological manner requires
that I use the pertinent languaging or terms. But I find this approach to be
very limiting and restrained and false in that respect. How does one speak
specifically in vague terms? One does not. One cannot. Instead, one tells a
story and thus conveys the attainment of any “meaning” to the reader. One lets
the reader draw the conclusions. Perhaps even leading the reader to what one
does not particularly wish to conclude.
And what, after all, is "true"? Are our experiences of ourselves, as we tell them, accurate? True? I would say not. Not because we're liars, but because we have our particular and literal points of view. We see in the way that we see. Which is to say that there are things that we do not want to see about ourselves; things that we avoid. Such blind spots are not so conscious to us; we just don't see them because we don't want to see them. Our stories are primarily for ourselves, even to ourselves. That someone else might listen or even hear what we say is validation to us that we are telling the truth and even that we simply exist.
Some of us feel compelled to tell our stories. It's not just for "attention"; it's because there are "vital human lessons" to be gained from reading these stories. There is some kind of wisdom, or at least some kind of "wider experience of being" that people should be aware of for their own knowledge of being. That's precisely why, in my mind, I maintain this blog and why I write in it. Somewhere, weaving in and out of the words, is a kind of spirit. Call it even a demon if you want to. It has power and knows things; things beyond the notions of "good and evil." It just is and is present behind the words. I have faith in this much, though it is unseen and unknown and unmeasureable.
No comments:
Post a Comment